Diversity & Inclusion
The FDA Commissioner nominee also commented on trial diversity, the role of public comment and expedited biosimilar reviews during his Senate confirmation hearing.
Clinical trial draft guidance webpages are back online following a court order, but with new language disclaiming any information promoting gender ideology as "extremely inaccurate."
The Association of Clinical Research Organizations has awarded “seed funding” to seven US-based community clinical trial sites to demonstrate proof-of-concept projects aimed at increasing diversity in clinical trials.
The US Health and Human Services Secretary nominee’s commitment should be a positive sign for those who want to ensure Americans can access adequate data on drugs in all populations that could use them.
Several critical FDA drug activities can skirt early Trump administration directives, but trial diversity and health equity work may be hobbled.
A six-year project aiming to establish a “less fragmented and more democratic” approach to clinical studies has commenced in the EU.
The draft guidance clarifies that sex and gender are not interchangeable, but could be vulnerable in the Trump Administration as Republicans have argued against transgender medical care and that sex and gender must be congruent.
The Equitable Breakthroughs in Medicine Development initiative, funded with a PhRMA grant, provides sites in historically under-represented communities with support to conduct clinical research. In an interview, EQBMED’s Tesheia Johnson Harris talks about the local sites selected, therapeutic areas for research, and learnings to date.
As the consultation period draws to a close for the UK’s new inclusion and diversity guidance, researchers and sponsors are being invited to participate in a pilot next year to submit a diversity plan as part of their clinical trial application.
The FDA Commissioner wants sponsors to incorporate diversity into their development programs prior to Phase III.
Flexibility on the geographic location of clinical trial participants will depend on the underlying reasons the FDA wants diversity in the study, the agency’s Oncology Center of Excellence Director said.
Sponsors can expect to see a copy of final guidance on how to comply with the UK’s new clinical trials regulation in August 2025, while the new framework is set to apply from January 2026.
Draft guidance recommendations on setting enrollment goals lead PhRMA and BIO to seek assurances of FDA flexibility absent reliable disease prevalence data.
Industry organizations argued feedback should be expected and object to draft guidance language suggesting it may be optional. The agency also should apply waiver criteria flexibly and address potential consequences if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say.
As efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials gain momentum globally, the Pink Sheet asked regulators in the UK, the EU, Canada, Australia and Japan about their efforts to support representative enrolment.
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
The Australian teletrials program has surpassed expectations at its mid-way point and is being used by drug and device sponsors looking to enhance trial participant recruitment and retention by enabling access to rural, regional and remote areas.
Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss former Surgeon General Jerome Adams’ views on how the FDA can better ensure clinical trial diversity, questions about approving a new drug that would be used with a standard of care regimen that is off-label, and the agency beginning to schedule fully in-person advisory committee meetings.
A push for government-driven accountability in clinical trial diversity is coming from a right of center figure, but could it nudge the FDA to be tougher on industry? The Pink Sheet spoke with Jerome Adams about his more than 30 years of work on the topic.
A study suggests industry groups like PhRMA could use more of their influence to hold members accountable on trial diversity policies.