Supreme Court’s Consideration Of ACA’s “Individual Mandate” Has Three Possible Outcomes

At stake is the requirement for individuals to purchase health insurance and whether that provision is severable from the rest of the Affordable Care Act. From the pharmaceutical industry’s perspective, the most disruptive outcome would be to have the entire law overturned.

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider three possible outcomes related to the question of the Affordable Care Act’s mandate that all Americans must purchase health insurance.

On Nov. 14, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to three cases pertaining to a lawsuit brought by 26 states challenging...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

‘Prescription Drugs Are Not Golf Balls’: FTC/DoJ Solicit Clashing Opinions On Patents

 

Innovator drug advocates argued that the number of patents asserted by industry is not too dissimilar to other fields. But should drugs be compared to golf balls?

The Politics Of Divisionals: How European Patentees Are Still Gaming The System

 
• By 

At Medicines for Europe’s legal affairs conference last month, divisional patents were once again a major subject of discussion. Attendees heard fresh details of how patentee games are preventing generics from hitting the market and restricting wider access to major medicines.

Access Risks Loom For All Drugmakers With Fourth Circuit Mifepristone Decision

 

The FDA law establishing REMS authority does not preempt a West Virginia law that would restrict mifepristone use in the state, an appeals court said, a decision that could have broader ramifications for the agency’s authority to ensure drug access.

US FDA Will Not Pull Teva And MSN Hetlioz ANDAs, Rejects Vanda Citizen Petitions

 
• By 

The FDA concluded that generic tasimelteon products held by Teva and MSN Labs meet all statutory bioequivalence requirements and there was no “mistake” or untrue statement in the original ANDA approvals.

More from Pink Sheet

No Surprise Here: Foreign Drug Facilities Should Expect Surprise Inspections, US FDA Says

 
• By 

The FDA's recent announcement of plans to expand unannounced inspections at ex-US facilities should put firms on advance notice that their next foreign facility inspection may not be preannounced, Ivy Sweeney, acting head of the agency's drug inspections office said.

Base Benefit-Risk Decisions On Data, Not Opinion And Passion, CDER’s Tidmarsh Says

 
• By 

New US FDA drugs center director George Tidmarsh’s data-centric comments at a Reagan-Udall Foundation meeting on unapproved fluoride products could suggest patients’ and caregivers’ experiences will carry less weight in benefit-risk decisions under his leadership.

Pink Sheet Podcast: FDA’s New Top Drug Regulator, Sarepta’s Options After Elevidys Stand-Off

Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss the potential impact George Tidmarsh could have as director of the US FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the issues threatening the future of Sarepta’s gene therapy Elevidys.