Trimming The Tree: What’s In The PDUFA Legislative Package – And What’s Out

The must-pass bill has many FDA policy ornaments hanging from it, but the version released by Democratic and Republican committee leadership has notable absences as well, including Cures 2.0.

FDA ornament
It's beginning to look a lot like the user fee legislation will pass the House without drama. • Source: Nielsen Hobbs; the Pink Sheet | Shutterstock image

Because it is considered “must pass” to keep the agency operating, the FDA user fee renewal attracts a large number of bills hoping to be included, and the resulting legislation is often referred to as “Christmas Tree” in Capitol Hill parlance.

The draft House bill unveiled by Democratic and Republican committee leadership on 4 May is no exception. Below is...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from User Fees

America Next: Most Novel Agents With July Goal Dates Have Been Approved Overseas

 

The US FDA will not be in its usual position as the first regulator to approve novel drugs, with only one of the six novel candidates on the July user fee calendar seeking its first approval worldwide in the US

PDUFA VIII: Cutting Perceived Conflict Of Interest May Be A Theme

 

Ongoing questions about user fees exerting too much influence over the FDA could spawn a shift in the PDUFA structure when talks begin later this year.

US FDA Could Miss User Fee Spending Triggers With House FY 2026 Funding

 

FDA employees are concerned that while the budget authority total proposed for fiscal year 2026 meets the user fee appropriations' triggers, the FDA could have trouble meeting allocation triggers without cuts to non-review work.

US FDA’s Rising First-Cycle Complete Response Rate Draws Congress’ Attention

 
• By 

The House Appropriations Committee wants an analysis of how issues that led to CRLs could have been resolved within the first review cycle and seeks an agency crackdown on counterfeit GLP-1 agonists.

More from Pathways & Standards

Kennedy Appears Ill-Informed On Major Pharma Priorities, Creating Unique Lobbying Dynamics

 

The Health and Human Services Secretary made incorrect statements about the status of key industry priorities at a recent House hearing, which actually may be a good thing for drug sponsors.

US FDA’s ADHD Drug Relabeling Advances A MAHA Priority, Reviving Data Dispute

 

Extended-release stimulants will add a new ‘Limitation of Use’ about weight loss in children under 6 years, reflecting concerns about overuse from the Make America Healthy Again commission, a concern multiple studies did not find valid.

How Will Regulatory Filing Winds Blow Globally For Elevidys Following Patient Deaths?

 

Roche’s filing for Elevidys in the EU followed applications in Middle Eastern countries because those markets accept applications based on approval by the US Food and Drugs Administration.