House User Fee Mark-Up: Few Tweaks, But Concerns About ALS And Accelerated Approval

Clinical trial diversity, FDA hiring authority, and inactive ingredient disclosure provisions all get slight modifications. The bill glides through committee, but not without some complaints about agency performance.

Anna Eshoo speaks during Energy and Commerce Committee mark-up
Rep. Anna Eshoo discussed the FDA user fee reauthorization and other bills during a House Energy and Commerce Committee mark-up. • Source: Screenshot

Despite concerns from the brand industry, no major changes were made to provisions in the US Food and Drug Administration’s user fee reauthorization bill allowing generic drug sponsors more inactive ingredient information as it breezed to the House floor.

The bill would require the FDA to tell generic drug sponsors whether their products are qualitatively and quantitatively the same...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from User Fees

America Next: Most Novel Agents With July Goal Dates Have Been Approved Overseas

 

The US FDA will not be in its usual position as the first regulator to approve novel drugs, with only one of the six novel candidates on the July user fee calendar seeking its first approval worldwide in the US

PDUFA VIII: Cutting Perceived Conflict Of Interest May Be A Theme

 

Ongoing questions about user fees exerting too much influence over the FDA could spawn a shift in the PDUFA structure when talks begin later this year.

US FDA Could Miss User Fee Spending Triggers With House FY 2026 Funding

 

FDA employees are concerned that while the budget authority total proposed for fiscal year 2026 meets the user fee appropriations' triggers, the FDA could have trouble meeting allocation triggers without cuts to non-review work.

US FDA’s Rising First-Cycle Complete Response Rate Draws Congress’ Attention

 
• By 

The House Appropriations Committee wants an analysis of how issues that led to CRLs could have been resolved within the first review cycle and seeks an agency crackdown on counterfeit GLP-1 agonists.

More from Pathways & Standards

America Next: Most Novel Agents With July Goal Dates Have Been Approved Overseas

 

The US FDA will not be in its usual position as the first regulator to approve novel drugs, with only one of the six novel candidates on the July user fee calendar seeking its first approval worldwide in the US

PDUFA VIII: Cutting Perceived Conflict Of Interest May Be A Theme

 

Ongoing questions about user fees exerting too much influence over the FDA could spawn a shift in the PDUFA structure when talks begin later this year.

Repurposed Drugs: EU Pharma Reform Offers Boost, But Payers ‘Must Recognize Health Gains’

 

Incentives for repurposed drugs proposed as part of the EU pharma reform package are a “great step forward,” but more recognition is needed from payers and regulators to leverage the benefits of these medicines, experts say.