CBER Director Marks’ Intervention On Sarepta Gene Therapy Filing Decision Appears To Backfire

Former OTAT Director Wilson Bryan says Peter Marks’ order to file Sarepta’s DMD gene therapy application was mainly a public relations move, which does not seem to have worked in the FDA’s favor. Upcoming advisory committee could now involve as much scrutiny of the agency as the application itself.

backfire
Stakeholders likely will closely watch the upcoming FDA advisory committee meeting on Sarepta's DMD gene therapy candidate. • Source: Shutterstock

CBER Director Peter Marks’ decision to file Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.’s Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy application over review team objections was apparently intended to avoid controversy, but instead appears only to have escalated it as the US Food and Drug Administration heads toward an advisory committee meeting on the product.

Wilson Bryan, former director of the Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, now known as the Office of Therapeutic Products, in the US Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, confirmed to the Pink Sheet in an interview that

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Cell & Gene Therapies

More from Advanced Technologies