Impasse At US FDA Could Mean Stealth Abandons Barth Syndrome Treatment

In an interview with the Pink Sheet, Stealth’s CEO says she is not confident the company could design a clinical trial in the rare disease that would meet the FDA’s expectations.

impasse
Stealth Biotherapeutics left a Type A meeting with the FDA not knowing what to do to push the elamipretide development program forward. • Source: Shutterstock

Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc. and the US Food and Drug Administration appear unable to agree on the clinical data needed to review a treatment for Barth syndrome, in what may be another example of tension between a sponsor and the agency over how to apply regulatory flexibility for rare diseases.

The situation has left Stealth at a crossroads, as it awaits the agency’s response to a request to reconsider the totality of evidence already submitted for elamipretide

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Rare Diseases

More from Pink Sheet

EU Pharma Reform: Exclusivity Vouchers Alone Are Insufficient Incentive For Antimicrobials, Industry Says

 

European pharma trade associations EFPIA and EUCOPE outline their respective views on how the EU’s pharma legislation overhaul should tackle antimicrobial resistance, and why transferable exclusivity vouchers alone will not suffice as incentives.

Trump Administration Push For Dismissal, Transfer Of Mifepristone Case Leaves Overhang For Pharma

 

The Trump Administration requested a dismissal or transfer of a lawsuit seeking to tighten the safety requirements for the abortion pill mifepristone on procedural grounds, which still leaves the administration's position on the case's merits unclear.

Opioid Safety: US FDA Hears Mixed Messages On Adding Posmarketing Studies To Labeling

 
• By 

Some advisory committee members said adding quantitative data on misuse, abuse, opioid use disorder and overdose to labeling would be helpful, but others worried the two epidemiological studies were not sufficiently generalizable to a broader population.