A newly updated US Food & Drug Administration guidance for sponsors on dissemination of journal articles and similar content that discusses “off-label” uses of approved therapies introduces a new item to the lexicon of regulatory jargon: SIUU, or “scientific information on unapproved uses.”
If The ‘SIUU’ Fits: The New Vocabulary Of US FDA ‘Off-Label’ Policy
An updated US FDA policy governing dissemination of ‘off-label’ journal reprints and other scientific communications suggests the agency feels on firmer legal ground to reaffirm some guardrails. It also expands the regulatory vocabulary to include ‘scientific information on unapproved uses,’ or SIUU.
More from Marketing & Advertising
• By
The loss of policy analyst, legal, project manager and social scientist positions has experts wondering if the Trump Administration is eyeing a broader effort to limit DTC advertising. The OPDP layoffs are expected to result in delayed reviews of promotional pieces.
• By
Results from a single-arm study cannot support representations on overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate for the cancer drug, the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion said in another “untitled” letter implicating the agency’s CFL guidance.
• By
Sponsors should review longstanding agency concepts on consumer-friendly language and claims limitations, along with Office of Prescription Drug Promotion research and enforcement, when applying the 2018 CFL guidance to direct-to-consumer advertising, Sidley Austin’s Cope says.
• By
A retrospective analysis does not support a claim that multiple myeloma patients are more adherent to Hemady than generic dexamethasone, OPDP said in an "untitled" letter suggesting increased enforcement focus on promotions leveraging the agency’s 2018 CFL guidance.
More from Compliance
• By
While the pharma industry appears to be exempt from US tariffs imposed by President Trump, a member of the UK House of Lords says the details are unknown and warned that uncertainty “leads to less investment” in business as a whole.
• By
Trump announced a 26% reciprocal tariff on India, but a country-agnostic exemption of pharmaceuticals implies that the interests of Indian firms are protected for now. What is Indian pharma’s business exposure and what is domestic industry saying?
• By
Industry lobbing for pharmaceuticals to be exempt from President Trump’s sweeping US tariffs appears to have paid off.