US FDA Acknowledges Patient Frustration With CAR-T Boxed Warning

An FDA question to a patient concerned about the negative impacts of the CAR-T boxed label warning during a recent listening session indicates the agency may be thinking about improving its dissemination of the information. 

stesthecope wrapped around sign that says "side effects"
A patient suggested the risks of CAR-T be put in context of the risks of other treatments. • Source: Shutterstock

A patient’s concern about the potentially unintended impacts of the boxed warning for CAR-T treatment may suggest a broader US Food and Drug Administration interest in revising the warning and being more thoughtful about presenting the information.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Cell & Gene Therapies

Potency Assay Issues Delayed US FDA Approval Of Mesoblast’s Ryoncil For Years

 
• By 

The company’s failure to show its potency assays measured attributes directly related to the mesenchymal stromal cell product’s therapeutic effect highlights the importance of a robust CMC program for complex cell therapies.

Mesoblast’s Ryoncil: US FDA Changed Its Mind On Need For A Randomized Trial

 
• By 

Agency staff repeatedly said the BLA based on a single-arm study in 55 patients lacked substantial evidence of effectiveness in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease and a randomized trial was needed, but changed course “based on additional consideration” after a second CRL.

Ryoncil Chronology: Three Review Cycles, Two CRLs, One Dispute Resolution Request

 
• By 

The Pink Sheet’s Drug Review Profile looks at the timeline for the clinical development and US FDA review of Mesoblast’s remestemcel for graft-versus-host disease.

Gene Therapy Sponsor INTERACT, Pre-IND Meeting Confusion Lingers Despite FDA Guidance

 
• By 

PhRMA questioned whether proof-of-concept studies are needed before an INTERACT meeting and said a draft guidance describing the timing of definitive toxicology studies creates confusion.

More from Advanced Technologies

Ryoncil Chronology: Three Review Cycles, Two CRLs, One Dispute Resolution Request

 
• By 

The Pink Sheet’s Drug Review Profile looks at the timeline for the clinical development and US FDA review of Mesoblast’s remestemcel for graft-versus-host disease.

Gene Therapy Sponsor INTERACT, Pre-IND Meeting Confusion Lingers Despite FDA Guidance

 
• By 

PhRMA questioned whether proof-of-concept studies are needed before an INTERACT meeting and said a draft guidance describing the timing of definitive toxicology studies creates confusion.

US FDA’s Makary Floats Vague ‘Plausible Mechanism’ Approval Pathway For Rare Diseases

 

Ascertaining the novelty and benefits of Makary’s new drug approval idea – along with what it would take to implement it – requires more clarity on the types of studies he envisions being used to grant and confirm “plausible mechanism’ approvals.