South Korea’s position in the global clinical trial rankings may be climbing and the proportion of such studies taking place in the country for the development of global new drugs rising. But compared to other major markets, it still takes longer to launch novel products locally following their first global launch, a new study shows.
What Will It Take For Korea To Become A Trial Hot Spot?
Speedier Approvals, DCT Barriers Cited
Speedier approval of clinical trials, flexibility towards new technologies, faster access to new drugs and lingering regulatory barriers to decentralized trials are among the challenges South Korea is facing in becoming a global trial hot spot.
More from South Korea
• By
South Korea announces planned revisions to a government scheme to designate "innovative" biopharma companies amid allegations of "discrimination" against foreign firms.
• By
In an ongoing effort to accelerate the commercialization of select innovative drugs and medical devices, Korea’s MFDS is launching a new program for certain products that will receive regular regulatory consultations until they reach the approval stage.
• By
The Pink Sheet looks at what major policies and regulations South Korean authorities prioritized in 2024 and what may be in store for this year.
• By
Speedier approval of clinical trials, flexibility towards new technologies, faster access to new drugs and lingering regulatory barriers to decentralized trials are among the challenges South Korea is facing in becoming a global trial hot spot.
More from R&D
• By
The European Medicines Agency’s qualification of the AIM-NASH tool is said to signify a major advancement for clinical trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The market size for MASH treatments is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
• By
As Indian CROs are bracing for new registration mandates, an expert panel at the IGBA’s 3rd Bioequivalence conference discusses the implications of non-compliance in bioequivalence studies.
• By
Experts working in the advanced therapy space say the US has less strict criteria for regulatory pathways for cell and gene therapies than the EU, particularly for products in early development.