Medicare Negotiations: Industry Makes Headway At Appeals Court With First Amendment Argument

Judges on the Third Circuit panel in the BMS and JNJ IRA cases seemed sympathetic to industry’s concerns about the government using the term “maximum fair price” in the IRA’s Medicare drug price negotiation program.

picture of the US constitution focused on the 1st Amendment with a judge's gavel.
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held oral arguments for three industry appeals of IRA cases on 30 October. (Shutterstock)

Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutical Cos. found some sympathy for their First Amendment claims from at least two of the three judges on the appeals court panel hearing their consolidated case against the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program.

Key Takeaways
  • Two appeals court judges were sympathetic to industry’s argument that the IRA’s Medicare drug price negotiation program may violate the First Amendment due to the...

The oral arguments didn’t necessarily point to a clear or likely overall victory coming for industry in the case, but some of the judges’ concerns suggested BMS and JNJ may...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Litigation

More from Pricing Debate