Birth Of A Biomarker? FDA Doesn't Define Eosinophilic Asthma, Defers To Docs On Nucala

FDA declined to codify new asthma phenotype in the indication for GSK's Nucala, leaving emerging definition of eosinophilic asthma to the medical community. For FDA's endorsement, it is not enough to show that patients with eosinophilia biomarkers benefit; you also need to show that patients without the biomarker do not benefit.

FDA's approval of GlaxoSmithKline PLC's Nucala is a big step toward recognition of a severe asthma phenotype characterized by elevated eosinophils, but the agency chose to defer to the medical community on the task of how to use the biomarker to identify patients.

"Consensus on defining patients based on an eosinophilic characteristic has been challenging," Office of Drug Evaluation II Deputy Director Mary...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

Animal Testing: US And EU Regulatory Support Grows For Alternatives, But Validation A Hurdle

 

In this first of a two-part series of articles, US Pharmacopeia CEO Ronald T. Piervincenzi tells the Pink Sheet how the use of alternatives to animal testing in drug development is gaining traction and discusses the challenges that exist.

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Bayesian Statistics In EU Clinical Trials: EMA Discusses Balancing Efficiency With Rigor

 

Bayesian statistics could help clinical trial sponsors to include external information in their analyses, but concerns around bias and incorrect conclusions remain, the European Medicines Agency said.

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

More from R&D