Patient Advocacy With FDA Review Staff Will Be Tougher Post-Sarepta

Efforts by CDER management to encourage more interaction between patients and FDA reviewers may be part of the collateral damage from the difficult FDA review of Sarepta’s Exondys 51. The hopes of parents of boys with DMD pushed the regulatory flexibility by CDER management on this application – but may end up limiting the willingness of FDA reviewers to engage with patients in the future.

FDA entrance sign 2016

When FDA embarked on a more aggressive reaching out to patient advocacy groups in 2012, one of the frequently stated long-term objectives was to find a way to bring patients and the researchers involved with them into more direct contact with FDA drug reviewers.

The broad patient-focused scheduled meetings on diseases selected by FDA review divisions were intended as just one part of what was seen as an eventual effort to provide the resources of patients and

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Review Pathways

More from Pathways & Standards

US FDA Vaccine Framework Coming In Weeks, But Details Vague

 

New CBER Director Prasad will "unleash a massive" framework on vaccines, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said 15 May, raising questions about the impact on products nearing approval.

UK’s International Recognition Procedure: EU Dossier Faster Than US Or Canada

 

Companies that use the European Medicines Agency as a reference regulator for the UK’s International Recognition Procedure can expect a faster approval than those that use other national regulators, such as those in the US and Canada, an MHRA spokesperson has said.

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.