Posting Preapproval Access Policies Could Help Prevent ‘Blame And Shame’ Under Right To Try

Many biopharmas have not publicly posted their policies for evaluating and responding to expanded access requests as required under the 21st Century Cures Act. Putting this information out will help set patient community expectations, but will not viewed by US FDA as off-label promotion, experts say at BIO annual meeting.

Biopharma companies that elect not to provide access to their investigational medicines under the new right-to-try law should publicly post their policies to help protect themselves from “naming and shaming” by unhappy patients, experts say.

Since the right-to-try law has removed FDA as a gatekeeper to preapproval access, companies will now bear all the blame...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

More from Pink Sheet

National Priority Voucher Gives US FDA Commissioner Tool For Radical Regulatory Surgery

 

US FDA Commissioner Martin Makary will establish "national priorities" used to select sponsors for the pilot of “tumor board-style” drug reviews that would start before Phase III is completed.

US FDA’s CoGenT Pilot At Risk? Project Orbis Success May Not Save Cell/Gene Therapy Initiative

 

Despite following the path of the popular Project Orbis, the cell and gene therapy international collaborative review pilot is being reconsidered by the FDA's new management.

HTA Expert Warns Of Escalating Measures If Pharma Fails To Tame Prices

 

Too many “uninformative” drug trials fail to justify the excessively high prices of many medicines, while there is too much evidentiary uncertainty in European pricing and reimbursement systems, warned Anja Schiel from Norway’s NOMA.