EU Court Ruling Puts Pressure On Orphan Drug Developers

A recent ruling by the EU’s General Court has backed a decision to strip BMS’s multiple myeloma drug Empliciti of its orphan status on the grounds that it did not offer a “significant benefit” over Amgen’s Kyprolis. The case highlights the difficulty of providing convincing evidence of comparative benefit amid the growing number of orphan drugs coming through the development pipeline.

Lawyer
An EU court has ruled in a case concerning orphan drug exclusivity • Source: Shutterstock

The EU’s General Court has ruled that at the time of marketing authorization, a drug with an orphan designation must prove that it still has a “significant benefit” over existing products in order to keep the orphan designation, even if one of those products was approved after the new drug was filed for approval with the European Medicines Agency.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Lilly Targets Sale Of Repackaged, Redosed Zepbound, Mounjaro In Lawsuit

 
• By 

Eli Lilly is seeking an injunction barring a weight loss clinic from dispensing modified versions of its GLP-1 products.

Mifepristone Filing Supports 2023 US FDA Actions, But Experts Caution Against Overanalyzing

 

Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.

Supreme Court May Be Next After Federal Circuit Refuses To Rehear Teva Inhaler Patents Case

 

Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?

HHS Wants 340B Rebate Debate Out Of Courts, Returned To Government

 
• By 

An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.

More from Pink Sheet

US FDA User Fee Collection Safe In Preliminary Trump 2026 Budget Plan

 
• By 

The preliminary White House 2026 budget plan cuts agency funding, but not so sharply that user fees are excluded from collection.

Beyond Tariffs: The Silver Lining Of The US Pharma Security Investigation

 

An investigation by the US Secretary of Commerce into pharmaceutical imports gives industry an opportunity to comment. AAM CEO John Murphy talked to Pink Sheet's sister publication Scrip about the latest developments.

New EU Approvals

 

The Pink Sheet's list of EU centralized approvals of new active substances has been updated to include four new products, one of which is Tivdak, Pfizer/Genmab’s treatment for previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.