Still a largely self-pay market, China is in the middle of a new drug approvals rush with 48 clearances in 2018 and more pending, forcing manufacturers to innovate their access models. Among several emerging strategies, a "Three P" combination of pricing, private insurance and patient assistance seems to be winning the day.
'Three P' Strategy For High-Priced New Drugs In China • Source: Shutterstock
When a new drug gains approval in China, the road to the market is just beginning.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
A new annual report from China's CDE shows a rise in overall product approvals but a fall in the transition rate for conditional to full approvals, possibly signalling more stringent requirements.
While CMC glitches linger over a US NDA for Elevar/Hengrui’s novel liver cancer combination following a second complete response letter, the separate issue of underrepresentation of US patients in multiregional trials is looming large after new FDA draft guidance last year.
The main 2025 policy priorities for China's government as outlined in an annual report will include the strengthening of commercial insurance for innovative drugs and opening up cell and gene therapy and the hospital sector to foreign investment.
US pharma leadership is painting its mission, particularly its goal to end Medicare price controls, as patriotic and essential to America’s global dominance over China, a move that seems designed to align with President Trump’s priorities.
Amid ongoing generic drug supply problems, Japan's government is to set up a new fund to support corporate investments geared towards manufacturing and consolidation.
South Korea announces planned revisions to a government scheme to designate "innovative" biopharma companies amid allegations of "discrimination" against foreign firms.
As Indian CROs are bracing for new registration mandates, an expert panel at the IGBA’s 3rd Bioequivalence conference discusses the implications of non-compliance in bioequivalence studies.