COVID-19 Vaccines: EUA Route Offers Advantage In Review Speed, Not Level Of Evidence

US FDA’s ‘may be effective’ standard for granting an emergency use authorization is expected to be comparable to the substantial evidence of effectiveness needed to support full licensure of a COVID-19 vaccine, although EUA allows for a more rapid review, agency officials say.

UNINCORPORATED DEKALB COUNTY, GA -Â?Â? MARCH 30: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention headquarters on March 30, 2013. The CDC is the national public health institute of the United States.
A CDC advisory committee heard about the level of evidence needed for an emergency use authorization. • Source: Shutterstock

The level of evidence needed by the US Food and Drug Administration to support emergency use authorization of a COVID-19 preventive vaccine will be closer to that required for full licensure, as opposed to what might be the amount of data which could support an EUA for a drug to treat the novel coronavirus infection.

In a presentation to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on 29 July, Doran...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Vaccines

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Labels Now Quantify Myocarditis Risk, But ACIP Wants Other Changes

 
• By 

New members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices suggested concerns beyond myocarditis, questioning whether test-negative observational studies are giving an incorrect picture of effectiveness.

US CDC Vaccine Committee Revives Thimerosal Debate: A Portent Of Things To Come?

 

The new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted for new recommendations on the decades-old thimerosal safety issue and lays intellectual groundwork to revisit other past controversies and decisions.

Merck’s Clesrovimab Vote Reflects New ACIP Members’ Skepticism

 
• By 

The new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices members endorsed Merck & Co.’s monoclonal antibody for RSV prevention, but some questioned its use in healthy babies and potential interactions with vaccines given at the same time.

New CDC Vaccine Panel Chair Vows To ‘Rebuild Public Trust’ With Evidence-Based Medicine

 
• By 

The newly reconstituted Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will create new work groups to examine the cumulative impact of vaccine schedules and reexamine some older vaccines.

More from Pink Sheet

Industry Criticizes Dutch Decision To Slash PARP Inhibitor Reimbursement

 

ZIN, the Dutch health technology assessment body, estimates that the number of patients eligible for treatment with a PARP inhibitor will be halved following a reassessment of drugs in the class.

EU Biosimilar Filings, Opinions And Approvals

 

A list of EU biosimilar filings, CHMP opinions and EU marketing authorizations, including details of the biosimilar company, the brand name/INN, indication(s), the reference product/company, and the date and type of event.

US FDA’s ADHD Drug Relabeling Advances A MAHA Priority, Reviving Data Dispute

 

Extended-release stimulants will add a new ‘Limitation of Use’ about weight loss in children under 6 years, reflecting concerns about overuse from the Make America Healthy Again commission, a concern multiple studies did not find valid.