Legislators Seek US FDA Input On Teva Proposed Opioid Settlement

Reps. McKinley and Kaptur ask commissioner Hahn about potential for shortages if Teva’s proposal to provide free opioid addiction treatment goes into effect. States are pushing for more money and stricter injunctive terms in settlement talks with manufacturers and distributers.

Jerusalem , Israel April 5 , 2019 . View of the Teva pharmaceutical industries headquarters in Jerusalem
Members of Congress want FDA to weigh in on Teva's opioiod settlement proposal • Source: Shutterstock

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.’s proposal to resolve US opioid litigation with free opioid addiction treatment is facing opposition from a new front as members of Congress express concern that the plan could disrupt drug supply from other manufacturers. And in an unusual move, they are attempting to get the US Food and Drug Administration to weigh in on the plan.

Reps. David McKinley, R-WV, and Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, sent a 17 August letter to FDA commissioner Stephen Hahn nearly a year after Teva announced an agreement in principle with...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

How Pharma Companies Can Mitigate The Impact Of US Tariffs On The Supply Chain

 
• By 

If US tariffs on pharmaceutical supply chain products come into force they could be disruptive for companies. Ewan Townsend, of the international law firm Arnold & Porter, explains how companies can mitigate issues through negotiating with suppliers and reallocating tariff responsibilities.

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Europe’s UPC Issues Landmark Ruling On Second Medical Use Claims

 

The verdict by the Unified Patent Court in the dispute between Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Amgen explains what companies should look out for when deciding whether infringement has taken place when it comes to second medical use patents.

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

More from Pink Sheet

How Pharma Companies Can Mitigate The Impact Of US Tariffs On The Supply Chain

 
• By 

If US tariffs on pharmaceutical supply chain products come into force they could be disruptive for companies. Ewan Townsend, of the international law firm Arnold & Porter, explains how companies can mitigate issues through negotiating with suppliers and reallocating tariff responsibilities.

‘The Question Is, What’s Going To Happen Next?’ – The Future For Biosimilars In Europe

 
• By 

With European biosimilars developers buoyed by recent regulatory moves, Medicines for Europe’s Isabell Remus and Julie Maréchal-Jamil discuss the next steps forward for the industry.