Pandemic Perspectives: Veklury’s Clinical Development Timeline Compressed By Collaborative Review, Previous Research

Just five and half years elapsed between Gilead’s first remdesivir IND for Ebola virus and Veklury’s US FDA approval for COVID-19.

The exigencies of the COVID-19 pandemic have driven unprecedented cooperation and creativity in drug development and regulation, but only one therapy for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 has reached the milestone of US FDA approval as a traditional NDA as well as under emergency use authorization: Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s Veklury (remdesivir). FDA review documents show how the agency used its existing regulatory authorities, especially the fast track designation, to condense clinical and review processes – while at the same time, the World Health Organization was sponsoring its own trial, resulting in conflicting recommendations from two of the world’s foremost health authorities.

Pandemic Perspectives

One year on from the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a global pandemic on 11 March 2020, editors across Informa Pharma Intelligence publications are taking a closer look...

Thanks to earlier research against Ebola virus disease and the SARS and MERS coronaviruses, remdesivir was identified early on as a potential COVID-19 candidate. When WHO declared a pandemic on...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Drug Review Profiles

Potency Assay Issues Delayed US FDA Approval Of Mesoblast’s Ryoncil For Years

 
• By 

The company’s failure to show its potency assays measured attributes directly related to the mesenchymal stromal cell product’s therapeutic effect highlights the importance of a robust CMC program for complex cell therapies.

Mesoblast’s Ryoncil: US FDA Changed Its Mind On Need For A Randomized Trial

 
• By 

Agency staff repeatedly said the BLA based on a single-arm study in 55 patients lacked substantial evidence of effectiveness in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease and a randomized trial was needed, but changed course “based on additional consideration” after a second CRL.

Ryoncil Chronology: Three Review Cycles, Two CRLs, One Dispute Resolution Request

 
• By 

The Pink Sheet’s Drug Review Profile looks at the timeline for the clinical development and US FDA review of Mesoblast’s remestemcel for graft-versus-host disease.

Testosterone, TRAVERSE, And A Label Change 15 Years In The Making

 

The Pink Sheet drug review profile investigates the long and rigorous process behind the FDA’s recent relaxation of the cardiovascular safety warning for testosterone products.

More from Product Reviews

Legal, Process Problems May Plague New US FDA COVID-19 Vaccine Policy

 

The FDA may have violated laws and regulations along with many norms in how it released its planned changes for COVID-19 vaccine approvals.

Novavax’s COVID-19 Vaccine Label Narrowed After Political Officials Intervened

 

The label that Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine was slated to receive before political officials held up the approval was broader than was granted 16 May.

Biomarker Negativity At Issue In Pfizer Bid To Broaden Talzenna CRPC Claim

 

The FDA questioned Pfizer’s reliance on a “large, incompletely defined” subgroup of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without known HRR gene alterations in its review of the proposed expansion of Talzenna’s first-line indication for HRR-mutated CRPC to an all-comers population.