The advisory committee review of aducanumab in November was a bruising affair for the US Food and Drug Administration, with a near unanimous vote against the drug and several pointed remarks directed to the agency by panelists about what they saw as an overly collegial relationship with the sponsor. FDA’s subsequent decision to grant accelerated approval of the Alzheimer’s drug suggested that the agency basically ignored the advisory committee, but newly released documents show that reviewers actually engaged in an extensive effort to downplay and dispute the panel’s conclusions.
FDA On What Aduhelm AdCom Got Wrong: Statistics, Investigational Drugs, Patient Perspective
After a searing advisory committee on aducanumab, FDA reviewers undertook an extensive effort to counter or discount the panel’s criticisms, newly released review documents show. Among the unusual moves by the agency was the citation of data from two investigational products, Lilly’s donanemab and Biogen/Eisai’s BAN2401, as evidence in support of aducanumab.
More from Approval Standards
• By
A risk-based approach to human cell therapies and tissue-based products could incentivize development and prevent bad actors from taking advantage of the current FDA system.
• By
US FDA Commissioner nominee Martin Makary is being embraced by industry, and Senate Democrats, as a more traditional pick than other Trump Administration nominees, but the Make America Healthy Again agenda still is clearly coming to the agency.
• By
The Pink Sheet's list of EU centralized approvals of new active substances has been updated to include four new products, one of which is Vimkunya, Bavarian Nordic's chikungunya vaccine.
• By
The FDA generic drugs team’s first public workshop of the second Trump Administration ended with a request that industry amplify the value it finds from public engagement.
More from Pathways & Standards
• By
Novartis is planning to file EU and US marketing applications for an intrathecal formulation of its spinal muscular atrophy gene therapy, Zolgensma, in H1 2025.
• By
The FDA’s accelerated approval draft guidance has left stakeholders seeking clarification of the process for determining a surrogate marker or intermediate clinical endpoint is reasonably likely to confirm clinical benefit.
• By
A risk-based approach to human cell therapies and tissue-based products could incentivize development and prevent bad actors from taking advantage of the current FDA system.