FDA On What Aduhelm AdCom Got Wrong: Statistics, Investigational Drugs, Patient Perspective

After a searing advisory committee on aducanumab, FDA reviewers undertook an extensive effort to counter or discount the panel’s criticisms, newly released review documents show. Among the unusual moves by the agency was the citation of data from two investigational products, Lilly’s donanemab and Biogen/Eisai’s BAN2401, as evidence in support of aducanumab.

Alzheimer's
FDA answers critics in review documents for Alzheimer's disease drug Aduhelm • Source: Alamy

The advisory committee review of aducanumab in November was a bruising affair for the US Food and Drug Administration, with a near unanimous vote against the drug and several pointed remarks directed to the agency by panelists about what they saw as an overly collegial relationship with the sponsor. FDA’s subsequent decision to grant accelerated approval of the Alzheimer’s drug suggested that the agency basically ignored the advisory committee, but newly released documents show that reviewers actually engaged in an extensive effort to downplay and dispute the panel’s conclusions. 

The committee erred in endorsing the findings of FDA’s statistical reviewers, failed to consider the similar treatment effects on clinical endpoints of two investigational drugs, and gave inadequate weight to the patient perspective, FDA reviewers said

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Approval Standards

US FDA Rare Disease Case Studies Provide Development Models For Sponsors

 

Sanofi’s Xenpozyme and Sentynyl’s Nulibry are the first two case studies the FDA is using to continue educating rare disease sponsors on best practices.

Pink Sheet Podcast: A New Director For US FDA’s Biologics Center, Guidance Production Slowdowns

 

Pink Sheet editors discuss the appointment of Vinay Prasad as the new director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and revelations that FDA layoffs now are hindering development of guidance documents.

US FDA Advisory Committee Misperceptions Abound … At HHS

 

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regularly decries the “conflicts of interest” he believes abound in advisory committees, but his concerns, as well as a recent “policy directive” eliminating industry representatives, seem driven by a misunderstanding of the panels’ jobs.

US FDA Guidance Roadblock: Writing Continues, But Publication Has Slowed Or Stopped

 

Cuts to the FDA’s policy and legal personnel have prevented dozens of product-specific guidances for generic drug development from being published.

More from Pathways & Standards