US FDA Loses Orphan Exclusivity Case While HHS Wins Dismissal Of Pfizer Kickback Complaint

In rare loss for FDA, appeals court reverses district court decision tossing Catalyst’s suit over Orphan Drug Act, saying deference should not have been granted to agency’s interpretation. District court finds it is too early to rule on one Pfizer charity co-pay program but backs broad reading of Anti-Kickback Statute.

Win Lose
US government wins one pharma case and loses another. • Source: Alamy

The federal government lost one pharma case and won another in a pair of decisions issued last week. In a rare upset for the US Food and Drug Administration, an appeals court ruled against the agency’s interpretation of the Orphan Drug Act. And a district court threw out Pfizer Inc.’s complaint against the Department of Health and Human Services seeking a ruling that its proposed charity co-pay programs do not violate the Anti-Kickback Statute.

In the FDA dispute, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. objected to the agency’s approval of Jacobus Pharmaceutical Co. Inc’s drug Ruzurgi (amifampridine) despite the fact Catalyst had orphan exclusivity for Firdapse (amifampridine)

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Rare Diseases

US FDA Rare Disease Case Studies Provide Development Models For Sponsors

 

Sanofi’s Xenpozyme and Sentynyl’s Nulibry are the first two case studies the FDA is using to continue educating rare disease sponsors on best practices.

House Budget Bill Includes Delayed Orphan Fix, Also Risks Downstream Cell and Gene Coverage

 

The first two classes of negotiated drugs under the Inflation Reduction Act would not benefit from a rare disease adjustment House Republicans included in their reconciliation package.

Tougher Approval Standards May Follow Vinay Prasad’s Appointment To Lead US FDA’s CBER

 

Industry is concerned that Prasad may make regulatory flexibility tougher to obtain for cell and gene therapy, while vaccine and public health advocates are angry about Prasad’s criticisms of US COVID-19 policies.

Sponsors Like START Rare Disease Pilot, Will Prasad Maintain Its Momentum?

 
• By 

Sponsors reported faster development times for products that joined the pilot program intended to speed rare disease treatments in CBER.

More from Pink Sheet

Darzalex Faspro Gains US FDA AdComm Support For Smoldering Myeloma Claim

 

The use of J&J’s Darzalex Faspro in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma could result in overtreatment, but the FDA committee voted in favor of the new claim for delay in development of multiple myeloma.

STARGLO Dulled: Genentech’s Columvi Data Not Generalizable To US Patients, FDA Panel Says

 
• By 

The glofitamab trial results are not generalizable due to the small number of enrolled US lymphoma patients and adverse results across multiple endpoints for patients from non-Asian regions, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee said.

Legal, Process Problems May Plague New US FDA COVID-19 Vaccine Policy

 

The FDA may have violated laws and regulations along with many norms in how it released its planned changes for COVID-19 vaccine approvals.