1. Pink Sheet
  2. >>Pathways & Standards
  3. >>User Fees

Complete Response Letters: US FDA Tells Congress Broader Disclosures To Sponsors Could Be ‘Chilling’

 
• By Derrick Gingery

A lengthy hearing that addressed everything from Aduhelm to advanced manufacturing serves as the formal kick off of the user fee reauthorization season and offers a preview of many possible FDA reforms that House members could seek to include in the legislation.

Rep. Neal Dunn, R-FL, questions CBER Director Peter Marks
Rep. Neal Dunn, R-Fla., questions CBER Director Peter Marks during a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing on the new FDA user fee agreements. • Source: Screenshot

Internal US Food and Drug Administration documents on an application denial should not be offered to the sponsor if there are questions because the circumstances of the decision should not be a surprise, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks told members of Congress.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from User Fees

US FDA User Fee Collection Safe In Preliminary Trump 2026 Budget Plan

 
• By Cathy Kelly

The preliminary White House 2026 budget plan cuts agency funding, but not so sharply that user fees are excluded from collection.

Missing BsUFA Revenue Trigger Could Open US FDA Staff To Criminal Penalty

 
• By Derrick Gingery

Massive layoffs and the biosimilar user fee program’s historic flirtation with the non-user fee spending requirements raise concerns that the FDA could lose its ability to collect BsUFA revenue, which could mean a fine or jail time for agency staff.

Updated: US Likely To Lose Its First Approver Advantage After FDA Layoffs

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith, Elizabeth Orr, and Derrick Gingery

Mass FDA layoffs on 1 April were designed to spare product reviewers, but still touched many who are critical to the application review process or drug development, which could mean fewer treatments are brought to the US market first.

‘Pipeline In A Pill’ Or Pipe Dream? US FDA’s April Goal Dates Test Expansion Strategies

 
• By Bridget Silverman

Sanofi’s Dupixent, Amgen’s Uplizna, and Bristol’s Opdivo seek new indications, while J&J hopes to start a franchise with nipocalimab and Stealth’s day of reckoning approaches.

More from Pathways & Standards

US FDA’s Makary Floats Vague ‘Plausible Mechanism’ Approval Pathway For Rare Diseases

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

Ascertaining the novelty and benefits of Makary’s new drug approval idea – along with what it would take to implement it – requires more clarity on the types of studies he envisions being used to grant and confirm “plausible mechanism’ approvals.

Confirmatory Trials: Industry Wants Timely Protocol Feedback, More Clarity On ‘Due Diligence’

 
• By Sue Sutter

Consumer and academic group comments on accelerated approval and confirmatory trial guidances say the proposed criteria for determining when a study is underway are too vague.

EU Pharmacopoeia Adopts ‘Groundbreaking’ Cell Therapy Chapter, Seeks Feedback On Alternative Microbiological Tests

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

A new chapter that will be published in the European Pharmacopoeia soon is expected to provide a comprehensive framework for the production and quality control of cell-based preparations. Meanwhile, an existing chapter has been revised to facilitate the implementation of rapid microbiological testing methods.