The US Food and Drug Administration would be prohibited from reviewing or approving a drug or biologic application submitted “by a sponsor located in Russia,” unless the application is for a drug intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and for which there is an unmet medical treatment need, per an amendment tacked on to the House Committee on Appropriations fiscal year 2023 FDA fundingbill.
Drugs From Sponsors ‘Located in Russia,’ Would Be Barred From US FDA Review By House Funding Bill
Language of the amendment cleared by appropriators in response to the Russian war against Ukraine in FDA’s fiscal year funding bill is vague, making impact of the funding ban on industry unclear. Democrats supported the amendment but said they wanted to continue to work on language to avoid “unintended consequences.” FDA would get a 10% bump in non-user fee funds under the bill.

More from United States
FDA Commissioner Martin Makary declared during an interview with former Fox News host Megyn Kelly that there “should be nothing political” about the US FDA, but it feels like politics is infecting the agency in unprecedented ways about three weeks into his tenure.
Manufacturers have supported the proposed shift in oversight authority, which could create a more pharma-friendly environment in the drug discount program, but uncertainty remains.
Alonza Cruse, director of the Office of Human and Animal Drugs Inspectorate, and two other senior inspection officials are departing, along with Mark Raza, chief counsel from 2021 until January.
Three weeks after its user fee goal date, the FDA demanded a postmarketing commitment “to generate additional data,” Novavax said.