Companies whose revenues in the UK are shaped by the government’s Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing and Access (VPAS), which will end next year, faced a difficult decision last month.
UK: Will Companies Remaining In Voluntary Payment Scheme End Up With A Bigger Bill?
Uncertainty over the payments that will be due from companies to manage the branded medicines bill in 2023 and beyond has been a cause for concern for firms, which last month had to decide whether to remain in or exit the Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing and Access. If many companies have left, the “remainers” might end up paying more than their fair share, though the government has offered some assurance on this front.

More from United Kingdom
Health technology assessment body NICE said it has taken on feedback about the implications of allowing higher cost-effectiveness thresholds for some medicines after senior health economists offered diverging views on its methods.
Cell and gene therapy manufacturers must consider the practicalities of their product within the context of a health care system before it comes onto the market to be successful, experts from Novartis, AstraZeneca and England’s National Health Service say.
The UK branded drug industry is calling for adjustments to be made to the UK voluntary scheme framework for branded medicines, after the payment rate increased to 22.9% for 2025. Meanwhile, the generics industry says the scheme is functioning “as intended” and opposes any changes.
An initiative run by health technology appraisal (HTA) bodies in the US, Canada and England is looking at how non-traditional treatment benefits, such as the value of hope and scientific spillover, can inform appraisals and understanding of a product’s value.