Medicare Negotiation Guidance Rebuts Accusations Of Constitutional ‘Due Process’ Violations

The final guidance on the Medicare drug price negotiation program also addresses complaints that the government may violate the uncompensated ‘takings’ clause of the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution in the way it considers remaining patents and exclusivities for negotiated drugs.

CMS Points To Extensive Stakeholder Outreach In Its Defense • Source: Shutterstock

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services addresses some of the Constitutional arguments made in opposition to its implementation of the Medicare price negotiation in a final guidance on the program, which may offer a preview of the federal government’s defense against lawsuits now pending against the agency.

The guidance was issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 30 June. In it, the agency:

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Market Access

More from Pink Sheet

New EFPIA President Hopes ‘Sanity Will Prevail’ In EU Pharma Reform Dialogs

 

Stefan Oelrich, the newly-announced president of European pharma industry federation EFPIA says the EU pharma reform is “not an improvement on the status quo” in its current form.

UK Pilots Faster Setup Of Early Phase Oncology Trials

 
• By 

Oncology trial sponsors in the UK are being invited to participate in a pilot that aims to tackle duplication and variation in pharmacy reviews, which are an important part of setting up clinical trials in the National Health Service.

US CDC Vaccine Committee Revives Thimerosal Debate: A Portent Of Things To Come?

 

The new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted for new recommendations on the decades-old thimerosal safety issue and lays intellectual groundwork to revisit other past controversies and decisions.