Mifepristone Ruling Casts ‘Shadow Of Uncertainty’ Over Every FDA Approval, Biopharma Industry Tells Supreme Court

As the new Supreme Court term begins, PhRMA and a host of biopharma CEOs and investors implore justices to take up mifepristone case to prevent chaos for drug development. High court will also consider a lawsuit that would reduce deference to federal rulemaking and it may consider another that would increase corporate liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act.

Supreme Court building
Supreme Court is considering two pharma-related petitions and is to hear another case that will impact industry • Source: Shutterstock

The US Supreme Court is set to hear one case this term that could bolster the biopharma industry’s ability to challenge US Food and Drug Administration rules and it is likely to take up another case that would undermine industry's reliance on agency decisions.

The biopharmaceutical industry is in FDA's corner in the latter litigation, in which the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a group of doctors and associations of doctors who oppose abortion, have sought to eliminate

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

Medicare Negotiation Does Not Violate Due Process, Appeals Court Rules, Other Suits At Risk

 
• By 

Decision in AstraZeneca’s lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Department is a precedent-setting victory for the government and a blow to manufacturer efforts to block the price negotiation program.

UK Health Data Research Service Looks ‘Encouraging’ For Industry, But Implementation Details Will Be Key

 

Marcus Vass and Vladimir Murovec of international law firm Osborne Clarke tell the Pink Sheet what the government's planned HDRS might mean for industry, and how it compares with the European Health Data Space.

More from Pink Sheet

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

US FDA COVID-19 Booster Strategy May Not Be As Controversial As It Seems

 

US FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s call for placebo-controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of COVID-19 boosters is drawing a lot of criticism, but former Commissioner Robert Califf also supported the idea.

EU Moment Of Truth For Obe-Cel And 10 Other New Medicines

 

Autolus’s CAR T therapy obe-cel is among the medicines that are this week due for an opinion by the European Medicines Agency on whether they should be marketed in the EU.