US FDA’s Anti-Misinformation Campaigns Look Safer After Supreme Court Oral Arguments

FDA’s efforts to tackle misinformation may face fewer legal obstacles moving forward, following oral arguments at the Supreme Court on a case that could have broad ramifications for how the government communicates public health information.

outside of the US Supreme Court building
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on 18 March in a case stemming from government actions on COVID-19 misinformation. • Source: Shutterstock (Erik Cox Photography)

The US Food and Drug Administration’s ability to communicate with social media companies like Facebook about inaccurate scientific and medical information is likely on safer grounds following oral arguments at the Supreme Court on 18 March.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Lilly Targets Sale Of Repackaged, Redosed Zepbound, Mounjaro In Lawsuit

 
• By 

Eli Lilly is seeking an injunction barring a weight loss clinic from dispensing modified versions of its GLP-1 products.

Mifepristone Filing Supports 2023 US FDA Actions, But Experts Caution Against Overanalyzing

 

Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.

Supreme Court May Be Next After Federal Circuit Refuses To Rehear Teva Inhaler Patents Case

 

Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?

HHS Wants 340B Rebate Debate Out Of Courts, Returned To Government

 
• By 

An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.

More from Pink Sheet

Stand-Alone PDP Market Lives to Fight Another Day, Enrollment Data Shows

 
• By 

No mass exodus was seen from stand-alone prescription drug plans to Medicare Advantage drug plans between 2024 and 2025, according to one actuary.

Gene Therapy Sponsor INTERACT, Pre-IND Meeting Confusion Lingers Despite FDA Guidance

 
• By 

PhRMA questioned whether proof-of-concept studies are needed before an INTERACT meeting and said a draft guidance describing the timing of definitive toxicology studies creates confusion.

Europe Should Pay Drug Prices More In Line With US, Two Pharma CEOs Argue

 
• By 

Sanofi's Paul Hudson and Novartis's Vas Narasimhan claim that while Europe is home to some of the most important biopharma companies in the world, its position is in jeopardy.