Key Takeaways
- Absent any CFL guidance specific to consumer promotions, companies should review longstanding FDA policies, and research and enforcement priorities, Sidley Austin’s Torrey Cope said.
- Experience with dietary supplement health claims showed the word “may” and other qualifying language can reflect data limitations.
- An Opus Regulatory consultant said sponsors can leverage real-world evidence under the CFL guidance to promote to subpopulations who were under-represented in clinical studies.
Sponsors should review longstanding US Food and Drug Administration concepts on consumer-friendly language and claims limitations, and Office of Prescription Drug Promotion research priorities and enforcement, when developing direct-to-consumer promotions...
Speaking at the Drug Information Association’s recent advertising and promotion conference, Torrey Cope, a partner at Sidley Austin in Washington, DC, offered guardrails for sponsors developing consumer-directed promotions under the...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?