IRA Litigation: Pharma’s Exit Options Irk Third Circuit Judges

Two of three appeals court judges hearing Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen’s appeal questioned whether Medicare’s drug price negotiation program was truly structured in a way that gives manufacturers a choice not to participate.

person in business suit facing open doorways that lead straight to a brick wall conveying "no exit" concept.
Two of three Third Circuit judges seemed open to industry's arguments that Medicare's price negotiation program violates the Fifth Amendment and the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine. (Shutterstock)

Two of the three judges hearing the appeal from Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and Janssen Pharmaceutical Cos. of their consolidated lawsuits against the Medicare drug price negotiation program seemed to agree with the drug companies that the law does not offer manufacturers a true option of not participating.

More from Litigation

Mifepristone Filing Supports 2023 US FDA Actions, But Experts Caution Against Overanalyzing

 

Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.

Supreme Court May Be Next After Federal Circuit Refuses To Rehear Teva Inhaler Patents Case

 

Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?

HHS Wants 340B Rebate Debate Out Of Courts, Returned To Government

 
• By 

An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.

Kennedy’s Pullback of Public Comment Policy Make May Rules Vulnerable to Lawsuits

 

The Health and Human Services Department's decision to eliminate the Richardson Waiver may be a blow for transparency, but will not completely eliminate scrutiny of regulations, experts said.

More from Pricing Debate

HHS Wants 340B Rebate Debate Out Of Courts, Returned To Government

 
• By 

An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.

Industry Slams UK Plan To ‘Demand A Third’ Of Drug Company Revenue In Q2/Q3 2025

 

The government wants to raise the statutory scheme payment rate for newer branded medicines from 15.5% to 32.2%, after sales data for Q2 and Q3 2024 showed “higher than expected newer medicines sales growth.”

Medicare Price Negotiation ‘One of Many’ Solutions CMS Will Pursue, Oz Says

 
• By 

Physician and TV personality Mehmet Oz, who is President Trump's nominee for CMS administrator, said he was instructed by President Trump to explore “every single way” the agency could lower drug costs.