Surrogate Endpoint ‘Reasonably Likely’ Decision Process An ‘Uncertain Standard,’ Industry Says

The FDA’s accelerated approval draft guidance has left stakeholders seeking clarification of the process for determining a surrogate marker or intermediate clinical endpoint is reasonably likely to confirm clinical benefit.

Question mark
The FDA's accelerated approval draft guidance describes an "uncertain standard" for identifying acceptable endpoints, PhRMA said. (Shutterstock)
Key Takeaways
  • Stakeholders said the FDA’s draft guidance on accelerated approval does not provide a clear path for developing acceptable, reasonably likely endpoints, and should be clarified.
  • Commenters also requested more flexibility in the expedited withdrawal process, including longer timelines for submitting an appeal and public comment, and greater flexibility on the timing of an advisory committee meeting.
  • The generic drug industry said special provisions need to be implemented for generic drugs and biosimilars when a reference product is withdrawn.

The US Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval draft guidance has left stakeholders wanting more clarity on the process for determining a surrogate marker or intermediate clinical endpoint is “reasonably...

Commenters also seek more flexibility in the expedited withdrawal process, including longer timelines for submitting an appeal and greater flexibility for convening advisory committee meetings.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Review Pathways

US FDA Adcomm To Consider If Genentech’s Columvi Study Generalizable To US

 
• By 

Patients from Asia saw a differential treatment effect versus non-Asian regions in the Phase III multiregional study, with an adverse survival trend seen in the latter group, the FDA said about the lymphoma drug.

Califf In Conversation: ‘Decimated’ US FDA Teams Endanger Innovation

 

Pink Sheet sister publication In Vivo spoke to the former FDA commissioner about the recent layoffs and their impact on vaccine and other product development.

New EU Filings

 

Brensocatib, Insmed's investigational treatment for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, is among the latest products that have been filed for review by the European Medicines Agency for potential EU marketing approval.

UK’s International Recognition Procedure: EU Dossier Faster Than US Or Canada

 

Companies that use the European Medicines Agency as a reference regulator for the UK’s International Recognition Procedure can expect a faster approval than those that use other national regulators, such as those in the US and Canada, an MHRA spokesperson has said.

More from Pathways & Standards

UroGen’s Mitomycin: Are Randomized Trials For Bladder Cancer Necessary?

 
• By 

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will vote on the risk-benefit of UGN-102 for low-grade, intermediate-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on data from a single-arm trial, but the FDA also seeks input on requiring randomized studies for future treatments.

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

US FDA Legislative Lead Calls For User Fee Reforms As Renewal Talks Near

 

Deputy FDA Commissioner Grace Graham acknowledged the importance of user fees, while also calling for restructuring. She also said part of MAHA's mission is to reexamine uses of drugs not supported by data.