This is a regularly updated searchable list of products that have been filed with the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) under the EU’s centralized authorization procedure. The information is based on the EMA’s monthly updated list of medicines under review at the agency, CHMP monthly meeting agendas, company press releases, and original research by the Pink Sheet.
New EU Filings
Etuvetidigene autotemcel, Fondazione Telethon’s investigational gene therapy for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, is among the latest drugs that have been filed for review by the European Medicines Agency for potential EU marketing approval.

More from Product Reviews
Sanofi’s Dupixent, Amgen’s Uplizna, and Bristol’s Opdivo seek new indications, while J&J hopes to start a franchise with nipocalimab and Stealth’s day of reckoning approaches.
The European Medicines Agency has recommended five drugs for EU-wide approval , including Averoa’s Xoanacyl for concomitant hyperphosphatemia. Two companies have withdrawn their marketing authorization applications.
Eli Lilly’ will request a re-examination after the European Medicines Agency declined to recommend its Alzheimer’s disease drug Kisunla for EU approval.
The European Medicines Agency’s qualification of the AIM-NASH tool is said to signify a major advancement for clinical trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The market size for MASH treatments is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
More from EU CHMP
Sponsors of three drugs that are in the final stages of the EU regulatory review cycle are due to make the case for marketing approval before the European Medicines Agency.
The European Medicines Agency is this week set to issue an opinion on whether pan-EU marketing should be granted to Lilly’s Alzheimer’s disease drug donanemab.
The European Medicines Agency is re-evaluating the marketing application for Aplidin. The initial application was rejected in 2018, but that rejection was revoked last year following a court case for another company’s drug that clarified impartiality requirements for experts consulted by the EMA.