FDA CONTENT UNIFORMITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE: TESTING SPECS ARE REQUIRED

FDA CONTENT UNIFORMITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE: TESTING SPECS ARE REQUIRED for non-USP tablets and capsules that contain less than 50 mg of any active ingredient. In a recently issued "Compliance Policy Guide," FDA notes that current GMPs require "the establishment of scientifically sound and adequate specifications to assure" that products not subject to compendial requirements meet their purported standards. "Specifications for content uniformity are required, within this context," the guide states, "for tablets and capsules which contain less than 50 mg of any active ingredient." The requirements can be satisfied for such products, the guide adds, by adopting either USP test specifications, or "sound alternative specifications." The FDA guide also requires content uniformity specifications for relative standard deviation for both compendial and non-compendial products. The relative standard deviation specs are in addition to specifications for individual dosage unit assays. The guide points out that there has been "confusion" among tablet and capsule manufacturers as a result of a recent revision in the USP content uniformity requirements. Manufacturers must now include the relative standard deviation specification in order to limit large variations in test results. While "many firms have been reluctant to incorporate the relative standard deviation specification into their standard operating procedures," FDA notes, the USP monograph requirement must be met for a product to be considered in GMP compliance. FDA said that the requirement for specifications for both individual dosage unit assay and for relative standard deviation are applicable regardless of whether the product in question is subject to an NDA. The guide adds that "if an approved NDA does not currently provide for complete content uniformity testing, or provides specifications that are inconsistent with the USP monograph, the NDA holder must submit a change to provide for such testing."

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Ocaliva: Still No Clarity On Why EU Court Opposed Revocation Of Approval

 

Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.

Brazil Pilots Digital Drug Pack Inserts

 

A new pilot aims to take Brazil closer to ‘digital transformation.’

More from Pink Sheet

EMA Says Digital Transformation A ‘Fundamental Shift’ In Meeting Regulatory Challenges

 

Sponsors can expect faster evaluation processes for key medicines and greater support in mitigating medicines supply shortages this year as part of the European Medicines Agency’s digital transformation overhaul.

EU CHMP Opinions And MAA Updates

 

This is an update of recommendations from the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use on the authorization of new medicines in the EU, and updates on EU marketing authorization changes recommended by the CHMP.

HHS Rescinds COVID-19 Vaccine Advice, Usurping US CDC Role

 
• By 

By stepping into the role of the Centers for Disease Control and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is causing further confusion and uncertainty about vaccine policy, experts say.