COMPOUND Q UNAUTHORIZED AIDS TRIALS

COMPOUND Q UNAUTHORIZED AIDS TRIALS are being reviewed by FDA, the agency announced in a June 28 "Talk Paper". The trials are being conducted in California with drug supplied by the San Francisco-based AIDS activist group, Project Inform. Responding to recent media reports of adverse reactions and one death associated with the treatment of AIDS patients with trichosanthin (commonly called Compound Q), the agency said it will be "investigating the Project Inform operation." FDA Offices of Regulatory Affairs and Drug Compliance, as well as the regional field office, are involved in the investigation. The agency is obligated to respond to the unauthorized trials if it wants to cut off black market-style drug testing situation similar to the use of Laetrile in the late 1970's. FDA approved Phase I trials with a tricosanthin derivative, GLQ-223, are currently being sponsored by Redwood City, California-based Genelabs ("The Pink Sheet" May 1, T&G-8). Pointing out that "several news reports have incorrectly referred to the compound used in unauthorized studies as GLQ-223," Genelabs said in a June 29 release that it is not "involved in any unauthorized testing." FDA explained that the "AIDS activist group initiated distribution of a tricosanthin-based preparation imported from China, supposedly to test its efficacy in AIDS patients." Furthermore, "Project Inform undertook this operation without an FDA sanction or approval, and has apparently been conducting it for a number of months," FDA noted. However, FDA remarked that "the scale and nature of the Project Inform operation are largely unknown to the agency." One of the 42 patients being treated by a California doctor with a form of tricosanthin extracted from Chinese cucumbers died of unknown causes. Project Inform defended use of the cucumber extract, citing FDA's "compassionate use" philosophy.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Ocaliva: Still No Clarity On Why EU Court Opposed Revocation Of Approval

 

Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.

Brazil Pilots Digital Drug Pack Inserts

 

A new pilot aims to take Brazil closer to ‘digital transformation.’

More from Pink Sheet

Semaglutide: EMA Safety Probe Confirms Rare Eye Disorder Risk

 

The EU product information for Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide medicines is to be updated to include non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy as a side effect with a frequency of “very rare.”

Infographic: Leqembi – A Geographical Comparison

 

The Pink Sheet explores how regulatory approvals for Leqembi differ around the world, and looks at what is coming next.

EU Pharma Reform: Council Proposal A ‘Step In The Right Direction’ But ‘More Work To Be Done’

 

Experts from EUCOPE explain why the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed overhaul of the general pharmaceutical legislation could offer more predictability for companies than the commission’s initial offering.