A Cautious Guide To The Interpretation Of Clinical Trials From NEJM

Determining the success or failure of a randomized trial requires looking beyond the p-value for the primary endpoint, review articles in The New England Journal of Medicine urge.

Watch gears up close

Clinical trial results should not be interpreted as on a simple binary axis of success or failure, a pair of review articles in the New England Journal of Medicine's "The Changing Face of Clinical Trials" series argues.

The "unreasonable yet widespread practice" of labeling randomized trials as positive or negative based on the p-value of the primary...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

Animal Testing: US And EU Regulatory Support Grows For Alternatives, But Validation A Hurdle

 

In this first of a two-part series of articles, US Pharmacopeia CEO Ronald T. Piervincenzi tells the Pink Sheet how the use of alternatives to animal testing in drug development is gaining traction and discusses the challenges that exist.

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Bayesian Statistics In EU Clinical Trials: EMA Discusses Balancing Efficiency With Rigor

 

Bayesian statistics could help clinical trial sponsors to include external information in their analyses, but concerns around bias and incorrect conclusions remain, the European Medicines Agency said.

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

More from R&D

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Bayesian Statistics In EU Clinical Trials: EMA Discusses Balancing Efficiency With Rigor

 

Bayesian statistics could help clinical trial sponsors to include external information in their analyses, but concerns around bias and incorrect conclusions remain, the European Medicines Agency said.

Korea Pre-Review Consultations Help Accelerate R&D

 
• By 

A system of pre-regulatory review consultations for innovative drugs and devices in South Korea has contributed to the accelerated development of such products.