FDA's decision to enshrine regulatory flexibility about the nature of "confirmatory evidence" in its landmark 1998 guidance on clinical evidence of efficacy opened paths to approval for drugs for serious unmet needs that lacked the regulatory gold standard of two adequate and well-controlled trials, but the lack of clear definitions also paved the way for multiple review disputes.
"What may constitute confirmatory evidence is left undefined in regulation (wisely so, in my estimation)," Division of Neurology Products Director...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?