US FDA’s Three Review Speeds: Standard, Priority – And Oncology

FDA’s oncology review team likes to do things its own way – and at its own hyper fast pace.

The gearbox is in 3 gears
This three-stick gear shift might look rusty, but the FDA review engine means they are all quite fast.

The sheer number of novel oncology approvals by the US Food & Drug Administration is an astonishing testament to the pace of scientific breakthroughs and investment by biopharma companies in anti-cancer therapies.

More from Pink Sheet Perspectives

Precision Underlines US FDA’s 2025 Cancer, Neuroscience Candidates

 

Top areas for potential 2025 approvals were shaped by R&D focused on increasingly tightly targeted therapies, including the eight new candidates to join the still-burgeoning kinase inhibitor class and RNA interference, as well as many varieties of antibodies.

Novel Agents Up For US FDA Approval In 2025

 

CBER has at least 14 and CDER another 10 novel biologics among the more than 60 candidates with a user fee goal in 2025.

Balancing Competitiveness and Sustainability In EU Regulations, What’s Next For Pharma

 

Restrictions on commonly used chemicals, increased reporting requirements and enhanced environmental risk assessments are just some of the new EU sustainability and environmental rules pharmaceutical companies are potentially facing. While some measures are multi-sectoral, others are pharma specific. The Pink Sheet takes a look at some of the developments in 2024 and expectations for 2025 and beyond.

More Heart, Less Skin: US FDA’s 2025 Novel Approvals Should Reflect Pipeline Shifts

 

Only one-third of novel agents with 2025 goal dates come from the traditional oncology, hematology and neuroscience strongholds. Immunodermatology also is cooling, while cardiovascular drugs return to the front burner.

More from Pink Sheet

England’s NICE Wants Industry Involvement In HTA Sandbox Projects

 

Pharmaceutical companies are being encouraged to reach out to NICE in relation to its HTA Innovation Lab, which provides a sandbox environment in which the health technology assessment body can test new methods of evaluating “innovative and disruptive” therapies.

Brazil Catches Up With International Standards on Viral Safety Evaluations For Biotech Products

 

The Brazilian medicines regulator will also offer more clarity on the requirements for radiopharmaceuticals that are exempt from registration.

Korea To Revise ‘Innovative Company’ Criteria Amid Calls From Foreign Industry

 
• By 

South Korea announces planned revisions to a government scheme to designate "innovative" biopharma companies amid allegations of "discrimination" against foreign firms.