The US Supreme Court’s unanimous decision that the Federal Trade Commission does not have the authority to seek monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement in litigation eliminates the agency’s key weapon in fraud and antitrust actions. It also is beneficial for pharmaceutical companies, which have paid out substantial sums in so-called pay-for-delay cases and other matters.
FTC May Be Hampered In Pursuing Actions Against Pharma In Wake Of Supreme Court Ruling
High court’s decision that FTC lacks authority to seek monetary recovery in litigation is boon for drug makers who have been subject to hefty payouts in reverse settlement and other cases brought by the commission.

More from Legal & IP
Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.
Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?
An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.
The Health and Human Services Department's decision to eliminate the Richardson Waiver may be a blow for transparency, but will not completely eliminate scrutiny of regulations, experts said.
More from Pink Sheet
While the pharma industry appears to be exempt from US tariffs imposed by President Trump, a member of the UK House of Lords says the details are unknown and warned that uncertainty “leads to less investment” in business as a whole.
The EU Clinical Trials Information System has achieved primary registry designation in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in a move that is expected to reduce regulatory burden for companies and help them lower compliance costs by aligning with publication requirements in medical journals.
The UK government has listened to industry concerns about high clawback rates under the voluntary scheme and will review it in June in a bid to resolve the issue and “move on to bigger and more important things,” health secretary Wes Streeting says.