Vanda Sues US FDA For Documents Backing Complete Response For Hetlioz Jet Lag Indication

FOIA exemption does not apply to medical and statistical reviews of its sNDA, company claims. It says it needs the information to adapt its development program and determine if the agency made an error.

Jet lag
Vanda fights FDA for documents pertaining to jet lag indication for Hetlioz • Source: Alamy

Nearly three years after receiving a complete response letter from the US Food and Drug Administration denying its application for a jet lag disorder indication for Hetlioz, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed suit to obtain the agency’s review documents.

The company says the FDA’s medical and statistical reviews are usually the most critical evidence used by the agency to determine what action to take on a new drug application or supplemental drug application. “Without seeing the specific information, Vanda cannot understand whether and how to adapt its development program,” the 6 April

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Complete Response Letters

Another Regeneron CRL Prompts Regulatory Operations Questions

 

CEO Len Schleifer said during the company’s first quarter earnings call that most of the complete response letters the company has received related to third-party suppliers, not efficacy or safety.

US FDA Miss On Stealth’s Elamipretide Boosts Signal Of Broader Delays Due To Staff Cuts

 
• By 

Failing to meet the 29 April user fee date for the Barth syndrome treatment, and CDER’s request for a delay in responding to Vanda’s appeal of a tradipitant complete response letter, suggest a slowdown in review work due to layoffs and other recent changes.

US FDA’s Review Performance Held Steady Despite Stormy First Quarter

 

Organizational turmoil has not yet affected reviews of novel agent applications, with Q1 2025 approvals coming in low, but the first quarter share of the entire year is variable.

Elevar/Hengrui’s Second US CRL A Bad Omen For Multiregional Trials In Asia-Dominant Cancers?

 

While CMC glitches linger over a US NDA for Elevar/Hengrui’s novel liver cancer combination following a second complete response letter, the separate issue of underrepresentation of US patients in multiregional trials is looming large after new FDA draft guidance last year.

More from Product Reviews

Biomarker Negativity At Issue In Pfizer Bid To Broaden Talzenna CRPC Claim

 

The FDA questioned Pfizer’s reliance on a “large, incompletely defined” subgroup of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without known HRR gene alterations in its review of the proposed expansion of Talzenna’s first-line indication for HRR-mutated CRPC to an all-comers population.

UroGen’s Mitomycin: Are Randomized Trials For Bladder Cancer Necessary?

 
• By 

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will vote on the risk-benefit of UGN-102 for low-grade, intermediate-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on data from a single-arm trial, but the FDA also seeks input on requiring randomized studies for future treatments.

EU Moment Of Truth For Obe-Cel And 10 Other New Medicines

 

Autolus’s CAR T therapy obe-cel is among the medicines that are this week due for an opinion by the European Medicines Agency on whether they should be marketed in the EU.