1. Pink Sheet
  2. >>Legal & IP
  3. >>Litigation

Mifepristone Filing Supports 2023 US FDA Actions, But Experts Caution Against Overanalyzing

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.

box of mifepristone tables on blue background
Filings in key mifepristone cases are being closely watched for signals that the Trump Justice Department will take a different approach than the Biden Administration. (Shutterstock)
Key Takeaways
  • The first significant legal filing in mifepristone litigation under the Trump Administration defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on its safety program.
  • The brief is notable because it does not contain any antiabortion language or arguments typically associated with the Republican party.
  • Experts cautioned that it is unclear whether the brief indicates the Trump Administration’s overall strategy on the abortion pill, including whether it will continue fighting legal cases seeking to reinstate stricter safety measures for the drug.

The Trump Administration’s first significant legal filing in mifepristone litigation defends the US Food and Drug Administration’s 2023 decision on the abortion medication’s Risk Evaluation...

But the brief, in a case arguing the FDA should remove the entire mifepristone REMS, perhaps is most notable for what it lacks, which is any direct argument pushing for...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Litigation

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Europe’s UPC Issues Landmark Ruling On Second Medical Use Claims

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

The verdict by the Unified Patent Court in the dispute between Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Amgen explains what companies should look out for when deciding whether infringement has taken place when it comes to second medical use patents.

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By Craig Bleifer, Royce DuBiner, Max Bogost, Michael Brody, and Allyson Maur

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 
• By Derrick Gingery

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

More from Legal & IP

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 
• By Derrick Gingery

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

Medicare Negotiation Does Not Violate Due Process, Appeals Court Rules, Other Suits At Risk

 
• By Cathy Kelly

Decision in AstraZeneca’s lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Department is a precedent-setting victory for the government and a blow to manufacturer efforts to block the price negotiation program.

UK Health Data Research Service Looks ‘Encouraging’ For Industry, But Implementation Details Will Be Key

 
• By Anabel Costa-Ferreira

Marcus Vass and Vladimir Murovec of international law firm Osborne Clarke tell the Pink Sheet what the government's planned HDRS might mean for industry, and how it compares with the European Health Data Space.