Key Takeaways
- A case study by Staburo’s senior disclosure manager shows AI-generated plain language summaries of trial results, when reviewed by a medical writer, can match the quality of those created solely by a medical writer.
- Using AI can significantly reduce the time required to create these summaries, aiding compliance with EU Clinical Trials Regulation, but AI outputs can be unreliable and require human correction.
- Non-medical volunteers found both AI-assisted and human-only summaries to be of similar quality.
Plain language summaries of clinical trial results created with the help of the generative artificial intelligence tool, ChatGPT, and reviewed by a medical writer can achieve the same quality standards...
The findings highlight the potential benefits of using AI in clinical trial compliance processes but also emphasize the need for human supervision.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?