GENETIC THERAPY, INC. PLANS TO FUND USC GENE THERAPY RESEARCH WITH $30 MIL.

GENETIC THERAPY, INC. PLANS TO FUND USC GENE THERAPY RESEARCH WITH $30 MIL. earmarked for the new lab of W. French Anderson, MD, who will retire from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute as the chief of the Molecular Hematology Branch on Sept. 19 to take a position at the University of Southern California ("The Pink Sheet" June 8 and June 1, In Brief). In return for providing Anderson's lab with $30 mil. through a multi-year research grant, Gaithersburg, Md.-based Genetic Therapy, Inc. would get exclusive licensing rights to any patent that may result from the research conducted by Anderson, one of the pioneers of genetic therapy. GTI now has five Cooperative Research and Development Agreements with the National Institutes of Health and has supplied vectors for NIH's gene therapy clinical trials. Anderson is the lead researcher for all five CRADAs. Anderson expects to maintain close and active contact with NIH during his first year at USC. The continuing commitment to NIH includes plans to stay in almost daily contact with gene therapy collaborators Michael Blaese, MD, and Steven Rosenberg, MD, on ongoing gene therapy protocols and to visit the NIH campus in Bethesda, Md. every month. Anderson's lab at NIH currently includes about 30 researchers. At USC, he plans to build a program of virtually identical size. Rather than duplicating or competing with NIH's ongoing gene therapy research, Anderson wants to engage in the next major step: making gene therapy a low-tech, inexpensive procedure, instead of a high-tech, expensive procedure. One of the objectives to effect that change is to develop an injectable, targetable vector. The goal is to create a gene therapy that is pre-engineered for clinical use. In effect, physicians would then "be able to insert the gene of choice directly into the tissue that's wanted, into the appropriate place in the chromosome that's wanted, and have it regulated in the way that's wanted," Anderson explains. To reach this point, Anderson believes it will be necessary to examine "the various approaches that various viruses now use, and take the best features from each virus and build them into a sort of artificial virus-like structure which will transfer a gene the way that we want to transfer it." He added that he is particularly interested in researching the development of a vector that would enter liver cells carrying the low-density cholesterol (LDL) receptor gene and produce higher LDL receptor levels. Such a vector would theoretically be useful in reducing the incidence of coronary disease and strokes. In the near term, the first major report of NIH's adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency gene therapy trial is scheduled to be published in the New England Journal of Medicine in November or December. The trial was designed to evaluate the possible therapeutic efficacy of administering autologous lymphocytes transduced with a normal human ADA gene. Research has shown the half life of mature T cells to be in the range of three to five months, giving rise to a second ADA protocol, which will evaluate the efficacy of gene-corrected peripheral blood stem cells from a CD34-enriched population together with the gene-corrected mature T cells. That protocol, which has been approved by NIH's Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee but not yet by FDA, could begin by the end of the year. There are only about 15 ADA patients worldwide. The first NIH AIDS gene therapy protocol is scheduled to be considered at the December NIH rDNA Advisory Committee meeting, Anderson said. All told, there are 28 approved gene therapy protocols in the U.S. and abroad. The first commercial AIDS gene therapy protocol, for Viagene's HIV immunotherapeutic, was recommended for approval by FDA's Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee on June 16. Viagene expects to begin the trials by year-end ("The Pink Sheet" June 22, p. 8).

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Ocaliva: Still No Clarity On Why EU Court Opposed Revocation Of Approval

 

Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.

Brazil Pilots Digital Drug Pack Inserts

 

A new pilot aims to take Brazil closer to ‘digital transformation.’

More from Pink Sheet

US FDA’s Top Cell and Gene Therapy Regulators Forced Out

 

Office of Therapeutic Products Director Nicole Verdun and her deputy Rachael Anatol were escorted out of FDA headquarters on June 18. Disagreements over CAR-T regulation and Capricor’s DMD treatment may be to blame.

First Among Equals: US FDA CBER Director Prasad Gains Agency-Wide Authority

 

As Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, Vinay Prasad will advise the FDA Commissioner on cross-cutting issues, provide strategic leadership and be a public face of the agency.

Not Over Yet: Eisai And Lilly To Appeal England’s ‘Flawed’ Refusal To Fund Leqembi And Kisunla

 

Eisai and Lilly explain why they disagree with today’s conclusion by the health technology assessment institute, NICE, that the benefits of their respective drugs for Alzheimer’s disease are too small to justify the additional cost to the National Health Service.