A favorable June 5 ruling for private-labeler Perrigo to launch its own version of the acid reducer Pepcid Complete reflects the influence of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded the situations under which an invention can be considered obvious (1"The Pink Sheet" May 7, 2007, p. 7). Johnson & Johnson/Merck sued Perrigo for patent infringement after the private-labeler submitted an ANDA with a Paragraph IV certification to FDA to manufacture and market an equivalent of the famotidine/antacid combination, but the formulation patent concerning the use of the H2 blocker famotidine was invalidated on the grounds that it was obvious. In the precedent-shifting KSR v. Teleflex case, the Supreme Court said courts should now look at factors such as market demands and predictable solutions to a problem in assessing obviousness...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.
We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.
The UK’s research-based pharma industry and medical research charities have set out clear action points to drive greater diversity and inclusion in clinical trials.
Blenrep, GSK’s multiple myeloma therapy, faced a major setback when it was withdrawn from the market in 2022. The drug has since made a return as a second-line therapy, and is on track to being reimbursed in England.