The Value Proposition: Why Pharma Should Embrace Comparative Effectiveness
• By Kate Rawson
A greater investment in comparative effectiveness research appears inevitable, whether or not Congress creates a federally funded agency to conduct head-to-head trials. The Vytorin debacle is only the most recent reason why industry is wary. But there are steps pharma can take to prepare for the next big thing in health care policy. Despite Vytorin, Merck is one of the companies leading the way.
Kate Rawson
Merck & Co. CEO Richard Clark thinks comparative
effectiveness research is the next big thing in pharmaceutical
R&D.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
The FDA will use electronic health records to “get eyes” on drugs immediately after approval, Commissioner Martin Makary told the DIA 2025 Global Annual Meeting. He also wants to reduce development time with better communication and new approval pathways.
The EU is testing a groundbreaking “all-in-one” process for reviewing combined drug and diagnostic trials via a single application for coordinated assessment.
The UK’s research-based pharma industry and medical research charities have set out clear action points to drive greater diversity and inclusion in clinical trials.
Sarepta's rAAVrh74 vector, used in the marketed Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy Elevidys and across the company's limb girdle muscular dystrophy pipeline, earned a platform designation as the lead LGMD candidate prepares for BLA filing.
The UK’s research-based pharma industry and medical research charities have set out clear action points to drive greater diversity and inclusion in clinical trials.