Boost For Transparency As EU Court Backs EMA's Approach To Disclosing Clinical Data

The EU General Court has dismissed three cases by pharmaceutical companies that wanted to prevent the European Medicines Agency from disclosing certain data about their marketed medicines on the grounds that it would harm their commercial interests. Firms now have a clearer idea of the standards they will need to meet to claim their information is commercially confidential.

Law. Justice. Courtroom
Court endorses EMA's implementation of EU Transparency Regulation • Source: Shutterstock

The European Medicines Agency's ongoing efforts to increase the transparency of its drug evaluation process received a major boost after the EU General Court upheld the agency's approach to deciding on what qualifies as commercially confidential information in relation to an authorized medicine and whether it can be publicly disclosed.

On Feb. 6, the General Court, part of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), dismissed three cases filed in 2015 against the EMA challenging its decisions to...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

How Pharma Companies Can Mitigate The Impact Of US Tariffs On The Supply Chain

 
• By 

If US tariffs on pharmaceutical supply chain products come into force they could be disruptive for companies. Ewan Townsend, of the international law firm Arnold & Porter, explains how companies can mitigate issues through negotiating with suppliers and reallocating tariff responsibilities.

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

Europe’s UPC Issues Landmark Ruling On Second Medical Use Claims

 

The verdict by the Unified Patent Court in the dispute between Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Amgen explains what companies should look out for when deciding whether infringement has taken place when it comes to second medical use patents.

Life After Loper: Vaping Case Shows US FDA Retains Considerable Deference

 
• By 

A US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the agency in an e-cigarette case has implications for drugs and other medical products as the justices decided not to disturb the FDA’s ‘change in position’ authority, while also creating a complex new landscape.

More from Pink Sheet

Prasad Says Involvement In US FDA Product Approvals Will Mirror Prior CBER Directors

 

The remarks from the new CBER director suggest Prasad will not be involved in most product-specific decisions.

Scientists Work With AI To Uncover ‘Unexpected’ Drug Combos For Breast Cancer

 

A UK research team has used artificial intelligence to find new treatments for cancer using existing US Food and Drug Administration-approved medicines that are not normally not used for the disease.

Saving Part D: US Medicare Advisors Sound The Alarm

 

The US Medicare Payment Advisory Commission worries that Medicare prescription drug market trends may cause the stand-alone plan portion of the program to “wither away,” which could take the traditional fee-for-service side of Medicare with it.