The US District Court for the District of Columbia rejected Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.'s request for a temporary restraining order to stop Janssen Pharmaceutical Cos. from distributing promotional material comparing the safety of Novartis' and Janssen's psoriasis drugs, but said Novartis could file a revised motion for preliminary injunction.
Novartis Can't Halt Janssen's Promo Comparing Their Psoriasis Drugs
US judge is 'troubled' by Janssen's omission of relevant safety data in summary of Tremfya v. Cosentyx study, but finds Novartis claim of irreparable harm is 'too speculative.'
More from Legal & IP
• By
Eli Lilly is seeking an injunction barring a weight loss clinic from dispensing modified versions of its GLP-1 products.
• By
Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.
• By
Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?
• By
An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.
More from Pink Sheet
• By
The European Medicines Agency is this week expected issue opinions on whether the European Commission should grant EU marketing authorization for 19 new products.
• By
Miguel Forte, CEO of Kiji Therapeutics, tells the Pink Sheet why he is confident in the future of gene therapies, despite the global “turmoil” that is impacting investment in the industry and changes to the EU and US regulatory landscapes.
• By
Mechanisms in the draft treaty that the more than 190 member states of the World Health Organization have finally agreed to are expected to “materially affect companies,” particularly those that develop, manufacture or distribute pandemic-related health care products.