Do Fast Track Regulatory Pathways Mean Quicker Reimbursement For Gene Therapies?

The norms on securing market access are being rewritten for cell and gene therapies.

Fast Track
Accelerated regulatory pathyways can throw up evidentiary challenges for reimbursement • Source: Alamy

Without caution, fast track regulatory paths can be the “route to non-reimbursement” for cell and gene therapies, according to Eric Faulkner, vice president of global real-world-evidence at Novartis Gene Therapies. He advised that to succeed with payers, companies selling cell and gene therapies need to prove transformative effect and think “outside the box” when it comes to generating evidence and communicating with payers.

Novartis Gene Therapies

Novartis is the company behind the gene therapy Zolgesnma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) for the rare disease spinal muscular atrophy. It won approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2019 after being awarded fast track, breakthrough therapy and priority review designations.

It was conditionally approved in the EU in May 2020 after receiving support through the EU’s priority medicines (PRIME) Scheme. Prior to its approval, it was initially accepted for regulatory review under the European Medicines Agency’s accelerated access mechanism but later revered to the standard review timetable

Securing reimbursement for gene and cell therapies is challenging for a number of reasons, including high prices for products, small patient numbers, limited data and the fact that reimbursement systems are generally designed to reimburse chronic disease treatments that are administered over a long period of time, rather than one-off doses

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Product Reviews

Novavax’s COVID-19 Vaccine Label Narrowed After Political Officials Intervened

 

The label that Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine was slated to receive before political officials held up the approval was broader than was granted 16 May.

Biomarker Negativity At Issue In Pfizer Bid To Broaden Talzenna CRPC Claim

 

The FDA questioned Pfizer’s reliance on a “large, incompletely defined” subgroup of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without known HRR gene alterations in its review of the proposed expansion of Talzenna’s first-line indication for HRR-mutated CRPC to an all-comers population.

UroGen’s Mitomycin: Are Randomized Trials For Bladder Cancer Necessary?

 
• By 

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will vote on the risk-benefit of UGN-102 for low-grade, intermediate-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on data from a single-arm trial, but the FDA also seeks input on requiring randomized studies for future treatments.

EU Moment Of Truth For Obe-Cel And 10 Other New Medicines

 

Autolus’s CAR T therapy obe-cel is among the medicines that are this week due for an opinion by the European Medicines Agency on whether they should be marketed in the EU.

More from Pink Sheet

Novavax’s COVID-19 Vaccine Label Narrowed After Political Officials Intervened

 

The label that Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine was slated to receive before political officials held up the approval was broader than was granted 16 May.

Biomarker Negativity At Issue In Pfizer Bid To Broaden Talzenna CRPC Claim

 

The FDA questioned Pfizer’s reliance on a “large, incompletely defined” subgroup of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without known HRR gene alterations in its review of the proposed expansion of Talzenna’s first-line indication for HRR-mutated CRPC to an all-comers population.

UroGen’s Mitomycin: Are Randomized Trials For Bladder Cancer Necessary?

 
• By 

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will vote on the risk-benefit of UGN-102 for low-grade, intermediate-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on data from a single-arm trial, but the FDA also seeks input on requiring randomized studies for future treatments.