While at least 25 accelerated approval cancer indications or drugs have been pulled or requested withdrawn since 2020, there has not yet been a similar concerted regulatory effort in the non-oncology space despite a large number of products with overdue postmarketing requirements.
In late December 2020, Bristol Myers Squibb Company announced it was withdrawing an accelerated approval indication for the PD-1 inhibitor Opdivo (nivolumuab) in third-line small cell lung cancer because two confirmatory trials failed to meet their overall survival primary endpoints.
Although it drew little publicity at the time, BMS’ announcement would be the start of a bolus of accelerated approval...
Top areas for potential 2025 approvals were shaped by R&D focused on increasingly tightly targeted therapies, including the eight new candidates to join the still-burgeoning kinase inhibitor class and RNA interference, as well as many varieties of antibodies.
CBER has at least 14 and CDER another 10 novel biologics among the more than 60 candidates with a user fee goal in 2025.
Restrictions on commonly used chemicals, increased reporting requirements and enhanced environmental risk assessments are just some of the new EU sustainability and environmental rules pharmaceutical companies are potentially facing. While some measures are multi-sectoral, others are pharma specific. The Pink Sheet takes a look at some of the developments in 2024 and expectations for 2025 and beyond.
Only one-third of novel agents with 2025 goal dates come from the traditional oncology, hematology and neuroscience strongholds. Immunodermatology also is cooling, while cardiovascular drugs return to the front burner.
A new plan to tackle medicine shortages proposes to develop a set of incentives for companies to manufacture essential medicines in Spain.
In this second of a two-part series of articles, US Pharmacopeia CEO Ronald T. Piervincenzi tells the Pink Sheet which animal testing models have alternative options and highlights where further investment and research is needed to develop appropriate alternatives.
A “basket approach” to phasing out animal testing could help identify areas where “moonshot” research is required to implement new approach methodologies, according to EU industry federation EFPIA.
