1. Pink Sheet
  2. >>Market Access

Birth Control Guidance For Insurers Aims To Boost Coverage, Smooth Exemption ‘Pathway’

 
• By Leslie Small

Three-agency guidance, issued as Biden administration is hoping to emphasize reproductive rights in its reelection campaign, outlines the narrow set of circumstances in which a health plan doesn’t have to fully cover certain types of birth control.

contraceptives
• Source: Shutterstock

On 22 January, the 51st anniversary of the now-overturned Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling, the Biden administration seized the opportunity to reaffirm its support for reproductive rights – a stance it appears to be increasingly emphasizing as the 2024 presidential election draws near. As part of that effort, three federal agencies issued new guidance to help health plans and issuers avoid running afoul of the Affordable Care Act’s contraception coverage mandate.

Key Takeaways

  • Guidance says if insurer covers one birth control method per HRSA-defined category, it doesn’t have to cover any other therapeutically equivalent drugs/drug-led devices in same category.

Health policy experts who spoke to the Pink Sheet’s affiliate AIS Health, a division of MMIT, say that the guidance...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Market Access

Not Over Yet: Eisai And Lilly To Appeal England’s ‘Flawed’ Refusal To Fund Leqembi And Kisunla

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

Eisai and Lilly explain why they disagree with today’s conclusion by the health technology assessment institute, NICE, that the benefits of their respective drugs for Alzheimer’s disease are too small to justify the additional cost to the National Health Service.

BIO Notebook: MFN Pricing, Obesity R&D, US FDA’s Rare Disease Hub And Reaction To Review Program

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith, Mandy Jackson, and Alaric DeArment

Highlights from Day Three of the BIO International Convention include the realities of MFN pricing, AstraZeneca's R&D plans for obesity, the need for resources for the FDA's rare disease hub and reactions to the Commissioner's National Priority Review Voucher program.

Brazil Could Look To Germany, UK And Australia For ATMP Drug Pricing Rules

 
• By Francesca Bruce

There is a place for using external reference pricing to set prices of advanced therapies, but any such mechanism must take into account the specificities of the Brazilian market and health system.

Welireg Among Japan Recommendations; Economic Policy Raises Hopes Of Higher Prices

 
• By Lisa Takagi

Country recommends eights new drugs for approval, including six for rare diseases, and also announces macroeconomic policy the pharma industry says would enable some reimbursement prices to be raised.

More from Pink Sheet

US FDA’s Top Cell and Gene Therapy Regulators Forced Out

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

Office of Therapeutic Products Director Nicole Verdun and her deputy Rachael Anatol were escorted out of FDA headquarters on June 18. Disagreements over CAR-T regulation and Capricor’s DMD treatment may be to blame.

First Among Equals: US FDA CBER Director Prasad Gains Agency-Wide Authority

 
• By Bridget Silverman

As Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, Vinay Prasad will advise the FDA Commissioner on cross-cutting issues, provide strategic leadership and be a public face of the agency.

Not Over Yet: Eisai And Lilly To Appeal England’s ‘Flawed’ Refusal To Fund Leqembi And Kisunla

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

Eisai and Lilly explain why they disagree with today’s conclusion by the health technology assessment institute, NICE, that the benefits of their respective drugs for Alzheimer’s disease are too small to justify the additional cost to the National Health Service.