Cost Effectiveness in the US? Round One Goes Against Pharma

The stimulus bill provides an unprecedented $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness research-and does so with none of the key provisions biopharma companies hope to see as the US federal government takes a more active role in the field. The good news: this is only the first round, and there is reason to believe the field is evolving as most pharma companies would want. But this isn't the time for manufacturers to let their guard down.

By Michael McCaughan

The first round of the legislative debate over health care reform in the US did not go pharma’s way.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Market Access

More from Pink Sheet

EMA’s PRIME Scheme Explored: Growing Designations - But Are Accelerated Assessments Slipping?

 

While the first six months of the year saw eight new drugs targeting a range of diseases enter the European Medicines Agency’s priority medicines scheme, and three PRIME-designated treatments go on to win EU marketing approval, use of the accelerated assessment mechanism appears to be limited.

Global Pharma Guidance Tracker - June 2025

 

Stay up to date on regulatory guidelines from around the world with the Pink Sheet’s Guidance Tracker. The complete Global Pharma Guidance Tracker, with sortable and searchable listings going back to 2014, is available online.

US FDA’s CRL Release More Incremental Than ‘Radical’ Transparency

 

The transparency initiative collects CRLs already made public in approval packages on its drugs@fda site to post on the openFDA public portal.