Novartis Seeks 'Amicable' Resolution Of German Probiotics Dispute

Novartis is in discussion via its Hexal subsidiary with Germany's Association for Social Competition (VSW) over whether it must withdraw its Biosan range of probiotic supplements currently on the German market following a recent Higher Regional Court ruling. 

Close up golden chess pieces with blurry judge gravel and law book background.
• Source: Shutterstock

Despite winning a recent high-profile court case in defense of its Hexal-branded Biosan probiotics, Novartis AG may still have to withdraw these products from the German market because of misleading advertising made on individual Biosan supplement packs.

Against Novartis’ interpretation that the current Biosan range could continue to be marketed in Germany, the country’s Association for Social...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal

FDA RIF Delays Response On NPA NMN Petition

 

Due to staff reductions at FDA ordered by DOGE, but accounting for return of some employees after their dismissals were rescinded, agency missed July 31 deadline it had set for responding to the NPA’s petition and expects to respond by Sept. 30.

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Loper Bright Could Trip FDA On Self-Affirmed GRAS

 

Instead of arguing FDA’s not authorized to offer option under authority from 1958 Food Additives Amendments, potential litigation could contend the law requires agency to continue making self-GRAS without notification available.

More from Policy & Regulation

US FDA’s Kratom Focus Pivots To ‘Concentrated Synthetic Byproduct That Is An Opioid’

 

Explaining he was a heroin addict for 14 years more than 40 years ago “because it was so available,” Secretary Kennedy says “our agencies have been asleep in the wheel” but “now we're going to wake up and we're going to start to stop this before it starts.”

EU Green Claims Directive: Commission Says It ‘Has Not Withdrawn’ From Negotiations

 
• By 

What's going on with the EU Green Claims Directive? HBW Insight speaks to the European Commission, Parliament and Council to find out why trilogue negotiations seem to have stalled.

US FDA Extracts More Evidence To Ban Kratom

 

Recent warning letters to seven companies marketing products with kratom extract known as 7-OH are FDA’s first in three years referencing unlawful products containing kratom and the first of all its kratom-related warnings to reference extracts from the botanical.