1. HBW Insight
  2. >>Wellness
  3. >>Policy & Regulation
  4. >>Legal

Class Action Against Prevagen 'Improve Memory' Claim Unravels On Consumer's Memory Lapse

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Prevagen containers since 2013 have been labeled with an "improve memory," but the package a plaintiff purchased in 2014 apparently didn't bear the claim, according to a court ruling. A receipt for the purchase indicated the product was identified with “Brain Cell Protection” on the label.

Justice scales and wood judge gavel. Wooden hammer with law code books. Legal and legislation authority vector concept. Justice law judgment, hammer and punishment illustration

A consumer challenging "improve memory" claims for Prevagen dietary supplement isn't sure about the product's labeling at the time of purchase, prompting a federal judge to say it's time to resolve the consumer's complaint against [Quincy Bioscience LLC].

In US District Court for Northern California on 4 May, Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. de-certified a class action designation he granted in 2017 for a complaint alleging violations of California...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.

Loper Bright Could Trip FDA On Self-Affirmed GRAS

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Instead of arguing FDA’s not authorized to offer option under authority from 1958 Food Additives Amendments, potential litigation could contend the law requires agency to continue making self-GRAS without notification available.

EU Probiotics Deadlock: Ombudsman Finds ‘No Maladministration’ By The Commission

 
• By David Ridley

In response to an IPA Europe complaint, European Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly finds that the Commission’s interpretation of EU food legislation in relation to probiotics is “reasonable and in line with the main goal of this legislation, which is to ensure a high level of consumer protection.”

More from Policy & Regulation

Supplementation Unlikely To Help With Hereditary Hair Loss, Says German Agency

 
• By David Ridley

Germany’s Federal Institute for Risk Assessment says that there is "no evidence that people with androgenetic alopecia have special dietary needs or a special nutrient requirement.”

NAD Asks FTC To Pull Bandage Off Firm’s Plan To Exhaust Inventory Using ‘2X Faster Healing’ Claim

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

After National Advertising Division attorneys, in a review prompted by a challenge by Band-Aid line marketer Kenvue, recommended ASO LLV cease use of its “up to 2x faster healing” claim, they determined the firm had not fully complied.

Supreme Court 1935 Ruling Limiting Executive Authority On Appointments ‘Unravels’ Today – DoJ

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

In complaint and response to motion to dismiss, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter’s and Alvaro Bedoya’s attorneys elaborate on Supreme Court ‘s 1935 decision, Humphrey’s Executor v. US. Administration attorneys, though, contend the ruling isn’t relevant to the current FTC.